Did the (Former) Governor General of Canada Threaten the Life & Safety of the Custodian Chief Executive During the 2010 Throne Speech?
© 2010 Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.
Barrister & Solicitor
The adoption in toto of the coalition’s lexicon by Canada’s three sub-factions – the rich, powerful and Chinese – in 2004 during its earliest evolutionary period was equated in a recent supplemental as equivalent to enjoying air superiority over a battlefield. The reason why those in government, the administration of justice and the private sector chose that route was because they wanted to be full participants in the diplomatic corridor – using it to state their position in the same way the partnership did. However, in doing so it generated valuable ‘Iron Fist’ prosecution evidence because the Chinada complicit and loyal, in their megalomaniac narcissism, employed it to utter threats against the Custodian Chief (1, 2, 3).
The March 3rd, 2010 Speech from the Throne, coming as it did only days after the triangle of power and wealth embedded the Sign of Satan in the closing ceremony of the Hades Games, was watched carefully by the coalition for evidence as to how that initiative was received by the sovereignty-stripped parliamentarians. Almost immediately upon tuning in some twenty minutes into the live broadcast on CPAC, the lexicon was employed to acknowledge that link with the East-West Corridor of Diplomacy. The question then would be how would those attending the event react in the face of this early 2010 development of confirming that a satanic cult lay at the core of the public and private sectors and by nepotism-patronage and lengthy Liberal rule extension the administration of justice. Much to everyone’s surprise on the democracy, rule of law and human rights side of the ideological divide, HRH Queen Elizabeth II’s appointment-revoked constitutional representative employed the lexicon during a portion of the speech that lends itself to the interpretation she was uttering a threat against the life and safety of the Custodian Chief. The first of two was a coalition identifying triple shot between the eyes geo-gesture. The second a Clooney Maneuver. If this is an accurate reading of what was intended, this is more evidence of the now proven theory that when geo-married to and in close and regular proximity to militarized totalitarians who embrace Satanism, one becomes one.
Our Government will continue to strengthen Canada’s food safety system. It will ensure that families have the information they need to make informed choices and it will hold those who produce, import and sell goods in Canada accountable for the safety of Canadians. [25:30: q-Cl.M X3., Cl.M.] To prevent accidents that harm our children and youth, our Government will...
Note the supplemental title is posed as a question, because the argument, albeit weak given the first gesture has an assassination connotation, can be made she was in fact articulating the need to hold those to account for the Fiefdom Indictment and ensure the safety of the Custodian Chief. But as is the case with all high level appointments there is a reverse onus burden of proof. She will have to prove at trial she was distancing herself from the unlawful paradigm of governance, not protecting it. What the tribunal will take into account, inter alia, is evidence of her actions before and after the geo-statement. For example, she’ll have to submit into the record by why of verifiably reliable documentation she pro-actively sought to advance the reform, accountability and demilitarization agenda. If all she did was utter a few red flagged words and nothing more than the interpretation leans towards conviction, full asset seizure and a life sentence that’ll put her in a cell adjacent to where Adrienne Clarkson is housed.
